Talk:R v Church of Scientology of Toronto
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the R v Church of Scientology of Toronto article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Paired article edit
There really is a need for an article that covers the chain of events in Ontario from the Operation Snow White actions, through the raid, the various legal and publicity campaigns, Hill v. Scientology, etc, all as Scientology Series article, leaving this one mainly as a CanLaw article that covers the case itself. (I'll get right on it in my spare time...) AndroidCat 03:01, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Page title? edit
It'd be helpful if someone more knowledgeable than me could explain why the title of the page is "R. v. Church..." Is "R" used as an abbreviation in the Canadian legal system for The Queen? I'm not familiar with the abbreviation. 98.232.51.88 (talk) 17:22, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
"religious organization" edit
Does Canada officially recognize any religion? It doesn't have an official religion, and as far as I can tell religious organizations have no special legal status. - rakslice (talk) 07:53, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on R v Church of Scientology of Toronto. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071219080712/http://www.sptimes.com/News/32999/Worldandnation/Abroad__Critics_publi.html to http://www.sptimes.com/News/32999/Worldandnation/Abroad__Critics_publi.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:22, 20 May 2017 (UTC)