Talk:Queen Vic Fire Week/GA1

Latest comment: 13 years ago by AnemoneProjectors in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Comments to follow shortly. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 03:08, 1 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

lead
  • A single-paragraph lead is a bit small for a 17k article
  • It reads more like an introduction than a summary of the body
  • I generally discourage citations in the lead, since it's supposed to be a summary
  • I don't suppose you can photoshop out the person in the photo? ;)
    • Frickative has kindly improved the lead for me. It now has more citations but that's because there are now quotes, which require them. Frickative said she'd look at putting the writers part elsewhere as well (I couldn't find anywhere to put it since there was no other information on the writing process). The picture could be photoshopped, since that's allowed, and I think it would be great as she's just a random person with no connection to the show, but I don't have that abiity! –anemoneprojectors18:17, 1 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
      • Wow, that's a lot bigger. Great work
Plot
refs
  • The locations aren't strictly necessary, but you need to be consistent: add the location of all the refs or none at all, also, the linking is inconsistent (Nottingham is linked, but Birmingham isn't)
    • I've linked all the locations, I'll look at adding the rest of the locations later, assuming I can find out what those locations are.
  • The Guardian is published by Guardian News and Media, GMG is the owner
    •   Done
  • Don't pipe News Group Newspapers to News International—we have redirects for a reason
    •   Done
ELs

The main issue is the lead. At least, that's the only serious point from a GA perspective. I'll leave this on hold to give you a chance to make the necessary fixes. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 04:09, 1 March 2011 (UTC)Reply