Talk:Qiaowanlong

Dinosaurs Low‑importance

	Dinosaurs portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dinosaurs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DinosaursWikipedia:WikiProject DinosaursTemplate:WikiProject Dinosaursdinosaurs articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Palaeontology Low‑importance

	Paleontology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

It's not so certain that Qiaowanlong really is a brachiosaurid, and it was almost certainly quite a lot smaller than the BBC article says. I've discussed this on the special-interest blog Sauropod Vertebra Picture of the Week -- http://svpow.wordpress.com/2009/09/06/bifid-brachiosaurs-batman/ -- but I don't want to edit the article myself as that would be Original Research which is bad ... But if someone else does it and cites me, that's Good ... which makes ... perfect sense. Uh. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.229.143.26 (talk) 00:59, 6 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

(That was me, by the way -- I just recovered my lost password and can now contribute from my own account.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by MirkMeister (talk • contribs) 01:25, 6 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Add topic