Talk:Public Eye on Davos
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Tax "evasion" edit
- Citigroup received its award for the unscrupulous advice it gave to tax evaders.
and later
- KPMG received its award for encouraging its clients to practice aggressive tax evasion.
These should probably say "tax avoidance". Advising tax evasion would be illegal and I doubt these companies would, or did, do that. Hairy Dude (talk) 00:53, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
- Well, after reading KPMG it seems they did indeed admit to facilitating tax evasion in 2005, so at least that part isn't libellous. Hairy Dude (talk) 01:13, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Neutrality edit
Does this article present its topic from a neutral point of view? In particular, is the tone too sympathetic to the political and moral perspectives of the event organisers and supporters? Matt (talk) 07:32, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
CorporateAccountability: Updated according to German Public Eye page 10:35 +19,993 edit
Hi @CorporateAccountability:, imho there is absolutely no need to completely replace the cooperative work of years on 29 Jan 2015 10:35-10:42 ... by claiming updated according to German Public Eye page. imho maybe even worsing Public Eye Awards by, in addition, kicking away imho more reliable and imho much more existing adequate references etc. And imho there was no request to expand by DE-WP content, therefore, plus restore. Regards, Roland zh (talk) 11:06, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
- Version 03:28, 25 January 2015 re-established in good faith. see also versions and chaotic bot fixes starting the past two days. related edits seem to be 1:1 copy of German language Wikipedia. so no consence pls restore, 213.55.184.148 (talk) 17:16, 30 January 2015 (UTC)