Talk:Pseudomonas boreopolis

Microbiology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microbiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microbiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrobiologyWikipedia:WikiProject MicrobiologyTemplate:WikiProject MicrobiologyMicrobiology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Untitled

Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

I just did a Google search for "Xanthomonas boreopolis" and got zero hits - is this name accurate? Does anyone have a reference to verify it? - Pseudomonad 14:03, 25 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

All I can give you is that in Anzai et al. (PMID 10939664) Pseudomonas boreopolis nested in the "Xanthomonas—Xylella rRNA lineage." I misread the paper to understand that P. boreopolis had been transfered to Xanthomonas. I'll have this page moved to Pseudomonas boreopolis and correct the information in the taxobox. Good catch. Ninjatacoshell 14:24, 29 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Move done. DES ^(talk) 21:25, 29 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Add topic