Talk:Project M/GA1
Latest comment: 9 years ago by SNUGGUMS in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: SNUGGUMS (talk · contribs) 19:43, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Here is how the article currently compares against the GA criteria:
- Is it well-written?: Only minor things to do:
- Since the WP:LEAD is supposed to summarize the rest of the article, there should be note of what reviewers liked about this mod there. FN1 (Wired) also is not needed in lead per WP:LEADCITE, and can just be used in article body.
- Per MOS:QUOTEMARKS, "Isn’t" should be "Isn't" in FN1.
- "Ivysaur" should link to List of Pokémon (1–51)#Ivysaur
- "causes a KO"..... for those who aren't familiar with the "knockout" acronym, this should be used in full form.
- "SD Card" should link to Secure Digital
- Bowser should link to Bowser (character)
- Roy should link to List of Fire Emblem: The Binding Blade characters#Roy
- Done all of these. I think I'd better head off to bed, though. Thanks for reviewing! Tezero (talk) 07:16, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
- All except for first point :P. My pleasure reviewing this, too! You've got until October 28th to resolve all comments. Snuggums (talk / edits) 07:18, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
- Is it verifiable?: As a general note, the article also seems to rely heavily on the game's main website, which is a primary source. If possible, I would try to replace some of these with secondary sources. Either way, I have concerns about the following references:
- FN7 (1UP.com) is dead.
- FN12 is showing its URL as a title- this needs fixing.
- For details on downloads, it would be better to have a secondary sources for FN's 17, 34, and 35 since primary sources have the potential to stretch such statistics.
- Is it broad in coverage?: For something with a "legacy" section, there doesn't seem to be much on reviews.
- Again, with reviews, it's as I said earlier. I've changed it to just "Reception", though; all that would really count as "Legacy" is the competitive usage. Tezero (talk) 15:14, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah, "legacy" didn't seem right for such a short section. However, there's some commentary from GamesRadar and IGN that could be added. Snuggums (talk / edits) 19:31, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
- Is it neutral?: "Wario in Brawl took too much from the WarioWare games and not enough from the Wario Land games"..... without quotations around "too much" and "not enough", this statement doesn't come off as neutral. Either add those or change "The staff noted" to "The staff felt" preceding this portion.
- Is it stable?: Nothing of concern here.
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?: Both images are relevant, though the logo photo should list author(s) in its FUR.
This nomination is on hold for seven days as the concerns are not extensive. Best of luck!
SNUGGUMS, opinions? Tezero (talk) 15:14, 21 October 2014 (UTC)