Talk:Prism (geology)

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Dreadstar in topic Sources

Requested move

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposed move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move debate was move to Prism (geology). Lox (t,c) 08:23, 16 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

This article needs to be renamed. Per Wikipedia:Naming conventions, article names should not be adjectives. This article should be renamed to a noun phrase such as "prismatic mineral" or some such, and "prismatic" could be made to redirect there. I'll leave it to the geologists to suggest the most appropriate name.--Srleffler (talk) 18:23, 10 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Maybe move it to prism (geology)? It seems to be a different topic from prism (optics) and just plain prism is a dab page. - tameeria (talk) 21:25, 12 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
I would say Prism (geology) as well. Recury (talk) 18:52, 13 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
Prism (geology) seems a good choice by tameeria & Recury --Lox (t,c) 10:53, 14 December 2007 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Sources

edit

Hopefully the content and sources I've been adding make sense here. Here's a few more that I found that seem to have relevant content: [1][2][3] Dreadstar 18:24, 8 December 2011 (UTC)Reply