Talk:Princess Twilight Sparkle (My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic episodes)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: TeenAngels1234 (talk · contribs) 15:25, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

I'm gonna review this. Stay tuned.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 15:25, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

• Isn't there a summary presentation of the main roles of the crew? Like "X wrote the episode, while X handled the storyboard".
  • I don't really think this is necessary, because they can only be sourced to primary sources (either the show itself or tweets)
• The part about Mary Jane Begin seems to have little connection to what was written earlier. I suggest first introducing the creatures outside of the Plot section, (e.g. "the evil dragon Discord") and making if possible a prosaic link to what was written before.
• Isn't there some other review on these episodes? Even a third opinion would be helpful.
  • There are several reviews from fansites, but I have refrained from adding those per MOS:TVRECEPTION.​ Pamzeis (talk) 03:25, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

@Pamzeis: That's all.TeenAngels1234 (talk) 19:12, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it verifiable with no original research?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:

   C. It contains no original research:

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Brief summa. The article itself is considerably brief, but it still looks complete, since we're talking about two cartoon episodes with no huge cultural impact or complicated production. Passing.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 19:12, 15 March 2022 (UTC)