 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
db|There is an adequate existing article entitled Pressure vessel. This one is redundant and extremely badly written, in fact, ridiculously so.
This stub is so far out in left field that it is simply ridiculous. And there already exists an article entitled Pressure vessel which is much more correct. I am tagging this for deletion. - mbeychok 17:24, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
- Okay, if you say so.Freddie 17:25, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
- I removed the speedy delete tag. You don't want to delete this, but redirect it to Pressure vessel. --Commander Keane 17:35, 25 March 2006 (UTC)
Recreated edit
I have recreated this article, although in Australian usage it should be at pressurizer (or perhaps even Pressuriser but I think the American spelling has more currency internationally).
But whatever we call it I think it's a good topic. Andrewa (talk) 10:37, 8 June 2021 (UTC)