Talk:Press videoconferencing
Latest comment: 11 years ago by NickPenguin in topic Article blanked and redirected to Videoconferencing
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
 | On 26 Aug 2009, Press videoconferencing was linked from CNN, a high-traffic website. (Traffic) All prior and subsequent edits to the article are noted in its revision history. |
Article blanked and redirected to Videoconferencing
edit- Oppose merge/redirect request: The arbitrary blanking and redirect has been undone as no Merge Proposal template was previously added to the Videoconferencing article. This article is significantly more informative than the abbreviated material on the subject in Videoconferencing, and includes extra sections not provided there. The stand-alone article should NOT be eliminated since it will inevitably be refined and expanded, something that can't be done to every sub-topic in Videoconferencing. HarryZilber (talk) 00:50, 23 February 2013 (UTC)
- If this article's subject is suitably notable to stand on it's own, then feel free to remove the merge tag. If you feel that there is extra content here that should go in a subsection in Videoconferencing, then merge any relevant paragraphs there and change this page to a redirect. I am not concerned in either scenario, just cleaning up the backlog at Category:Articles_to_be_merged. --NickPenguin(contribs) 01:17, 23 February 2013 (UTC)