This article is within the scope of WikiProject European Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the European Union on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European UnionWikipedia:WikiProject European UnionTemplate:WikiProject European UnionEuropean Union articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This is a really important treaty article, which has huge implications for the relationship between member states and the community. There is a considerable body of caselaw and academic commentary on this article.
Please do improve this wikipedia article. Be bold, be reckless, be crazy, be whatever Arpitt (talk) 14:05, 19 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
I just integrated some things from my notes. – Kaihsu (talk) 20:29, 21 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
Royal Medical Society for the Promotion of Medicineedit
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I tried to find out what this was, and I only found references to the case where its "body" (as mentioned here) was considered to be a court. Is it just a rather abstruse name for the Royal Society of Medicine? Hairy Dude (talk) 19:59, 18 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
I fixed the name to “Royal Netherlands Society for the Promotion of Medicine”, which is in the judgment. – Kaihsu (talk) 19:57, 21 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
