Talk:Preiss RHJ-8

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

Specification revision

edit

The specifications listed prior to my revision were obtained from a California owner, who modified his glider in several respects, one of which was to gain concurrence from the designer to fly his unit at 1100 pounds gross weight (design is 1000 lb); this was obtained by agreeing to use a lower maximum maneuvering g-factor (from 12 g, down to 9.5 g). Since this is a personal thing, on a homebuilt unit, it is OK (i.e. anything goes on a homebuilt), but I don't think we should use it in the Design Specification table. I have therefore modified the table accordingly. Raymondwinn (talk) 05:45, 10 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Preiss RHJ-8. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:27, 24 January 2018 (UTC)Reply