 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Peer Review 1 edit
Content looks good overall. Would be better in a more narrative form, with less bulleting and numbering. Flesh out the steps and details more clearly for someone who doesn't know anything about the topic. Visual would be really helpful. The first paragraph could be a little clearer. The last paragraph could be separated into 2 paragraphs. There could also be a link to a Wiki page/definition of clinical settings. Also, we didn't see any references through the text, so those could be included.
Comparing power mapping to ecomaps was a good feature and made it more approachable and concrete. Gave a good comprehensive view of power mapping and why it's important. Great article overall!
Peer Review 2 edit
This article covers relationship mapping, not power mapping. Power mapping is (1) creating a list of stakeholders that are connected directly to someone working on the power mapping team and somehow interested/related to a goal, (2) mapping those people on a graph based on their level of influence (power) and current engagement, (3) strategically choosing stakeholders to target, (4) and taking specific actions to increase those stakeholders' engagement around the team's goal. << That's even in the moveon.org documentation that the article links to. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.134.224.93 (talk) 00:52, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Power mapping is also used much more widely than social justice work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.134.224.93 (talk) 00:53, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
Librarian Comments edit
You may want to be more specific for the title of your article. It looks like the term "power mapping" is used in other areas/disciplines, including finance, nuclear energy and other areas. Soossw (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 16:46, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Viewpoint Concerns edit
Under the heading Power mapping in clinical practice are seven numbered points. The 7th reads:
7. Microsoft power map percentage still under process.
Firstly what does this mean? And why is there a reference to Microsoft? Is the article a disguised product placement for a Microsoft product?