Talk:Porcelain Black/GA1

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Thevampireashlee in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jennie--x (talk · contribs) 11:50, 28 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Initial Comments

edit
  • Lead
  • The claim that Black gained a "cult following" needs to be sourced as it could be challenged.
  • "Musically, she fuses industrial themes with pop music conventions such as electronic synths and a heavy reliance upon hooks. The combination polarizing opinions, she is best known for her guttural vocals and two-toned hair." This doesn't make sense fully - what combination is polarizing opinion? Pop/industrial music or guttural vocals/two-toned hair -- could this be arranged more clearly? Furthermore, are there sources that prove something is polarizing?
  •   Done I decided to remove both concerns, as they seem to violate WP:BLP. Originally, I believed the sources under "Public Image" supported the polarization of opinion, but that might be original research. "Cult following" was OR obtained from source 5 which mentions the Myspace fandom.--Thevampireashlee (talk) 02:04, 29 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
  • Life and career
  •   Done
  • Artistry
  • Minor grammar note: The sentence "Often, comparisons are drawn between her and Lady Gaga[23][24][25] But, she has also been compared to...", the "But" should be lower case and there should be a comma after Lady Gaga.
  • Personal life
  •   Done
  • Discography, filmography and tours
  •   Done
  • References
  •   Done

Overall Summary

edit
GA review
Final Summary
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (Is there clear sentences, spelling and grammar?):  Y
    b (Does it comply with MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists?):  Y
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (Is there a references section?):  Y
    b (Are there citations for quotes/statistics/challenging info?):  Y
    c (Does it contain no original research?):  Y
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (Does it cover the major aspects of the topic?):  Y
    b (Does it use summary style?):  Y
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    (Are points made with due weight?):  Y
  5. It is stable.
    (Are there no edit wars, etc?):  Y
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (Do the images have appropriate fair-use rationales?):  Y
    b (Do the images have suitable captions?):  Y

Overall:
Pass/Fail:   Pass - A well-written article that makes the use of excellent reliable sources, congratulations to the editors and nominator Thevampireashlee.

  ·   ·   ·