Talk:Politics of Croatia/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tea with toast (talk · contribs) 23:48, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

I intend to complete this review bit by bit over the next few days. --Tea with toast (話) 23:48, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Well done! My congratuations to the editors for crafting a fine article. I like the organization, and am pleased to find that the article has comprehensive coverage with out going into needless details. I only have 2 suggestion for further changes:

1. In the "Elections" section, there is mention of "other minorities" that receive two or more MPs. Is it worth listing these minority groups?
2. If possible, I think it would be very relevant to include a section on the various political parties in Croatia.

Congratulations and good luck. --Tea with toast (話) 03:35, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for the review. Regarding 1, I thought it would yield a more comprehensive coverage. Regarding 2, I'll have a look at it shortly. Cheers!--Tomobe03 (talk) 10:08, 24 December 2012 (UTC)