I think that this page is basically useless: the one external link is to a skeptical post from 2006. I think redirecting it to Bayesian poisoning or creating a disambiguation list for Bayesian poisoning. Content-control software and Search engine optimization would be better. --Avirr (talk) 19:37, 16 October 2009 (UTC)
I disagree. I think it should be marked/classified as a stub and more information added. Googling "poison words" (with quotes) provides some helpful stuff. This is one of the top results, and it provides a list of examples that would stop the Google AdSense program from displaying an ad. Perhaps it, and this could help this stub out on its way to becoming a full-fledged article. Also, if someone decides it ought to have a stub template, I'm thinking either {{Web-stub}}, {{Internet-stub}}, or {{Comp-sci-stub}}. -- 207.65.109.10 (talk) 08:45, 1 August 2010 (UTC)