Talk:Poedjangga Baroe/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 19:24, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

I will review this article. At first glance it meets the GA criteria.

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Lead:

   "as well as requests to ten sultanates for support" - I think we can leave out "requests", but I am not sure...

   Background:

   Suggest linking of "feudal"

   'Publication

   Might want to eliminate "published" in "In the prospectus for the soon-to-be published Poedjangga Baroe," to avoid repetition

   Politics

   "Marxist", "fascism", "sonnet" should be linked imho

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Book 1 needs language parameter

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall: Just few minor fixes.

   Pass/Fail:

• Thanks for giving this article a look. I've fixed what you've indicated (well, I haven't been accused of overlinking in a while.) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:52, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. I am passing this interesting article as it clearly meets the GA criteria, if not the FA criteria. Regards and great work on Indonesia-related articles! :)--GoP_T^C_N 08:07, 12 June 2012 (UTC)