Talk:Plume (fluid dynamics)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | It is requested that a photograph of a plume sinking in a less-dense fluid be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Tamagon103.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 06:47, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
The section entitled "Simple plume modelling" needs rewriting edit
The last part of the subject section (just below the four numbered comments) needs to be rewritten or removed. As it now stands, it is completely incomprehensible. mbeychok (talk) 22:32, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Remove or move Space Shuttle image? edit
A rocket "plume" doesn't seem like a very good example of a plume. It's really a vertical contrail, it's verticalness caused not by the motion of one fluid through another away from the source, but by the source moving through the atmosphere and leaving smoke and water vapor along the way, a cloud rather than a plume. Craig Butz (talk) 20:27, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
- Agreed, its a jet not a plume. Replaced image with an image of a plume. Kees08 (talk) 02:44, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Since Gaussian Plumes was the topic that I was focusing on, the page has more information on it than any other plumes that were briefly introduced. This may make the Gaussian Plumes overrepresented in the page, so contributions to other types of plumes would make the article more balanced.Is there another wiki page that is devoted to Guassian Plumes that I overlooked?Tamagon103 (talk) 18:08, 28 April 2017 (UTC)