 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
 | The contents of the Fotovista page were merged into Pixmania on 26th July 2016. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Thousands of complaints, under French authority investigation
editTheir prices are very competitive, but as always, there's a flip side to the coin. As long as what you receive works and keeps working, it's a wonderful company.
This is not a forum!
editCustomer complaints
editWP:NOTAFORUM - comment removed. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 19:52, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- What you are saying may be true, but your account of your experience is original research, unverifiable and not supported by a reliable, published source. Therefore, it does not belong in Wikipedia. --Bwiki 21:07, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
Warning to buyers
editWP:NOTAFORUM - comment removed. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 19:52, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Pixmania.jpg
edit
Image:Pixmania.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:54, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
Back online?
editA month ago I tried to access the Pixmania site (for the first time in some five years). I found out that the site was offline. Checked Wikipedia,and saw that they had gone out of business. Now I see that they are back online. -- Petri Krohn (talk) 20:04, 29 May 2016 (UTC)