Talk:Pipe bursting

Advertising

Please don't put ads for contractors in the lede. That's a bit much. --John Nagle (talk) 05:44, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Revert of copyvio

I have reverted this edit from October as the editor had added two sections that were word-for-word copies of copyright text. The "Pneumatic Pipe Bursting" had cited and was a word for word copy of http://www.ipbaonline.org/?page_id=99. The "Static/Hydraulic Pipe Bursting" cites, and was a word for word copy of http://www.ipbaonline.org/?page_id=102

Both of the ipbaonline.org web pages state "© 2012 International Pipe Bursting Association" meaning this had been a WP:COPYVIO.

The editor that added this material did so from a computer at www.HammerheadMole.com. If that company wants to add material to which they own the copyright to Wikipedia then please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. --Marc Kupper|talk 06:15, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Text and Graphic don't match

Both the text and the graphic are valuable but the terminology used in two should be the same; for example, is the text's 'expander head' the same thing as the graphic's 'bursting head'?

The graphic shows 'lateral connections' and 'temporary bypass'. These should be described in the text.

An improved graphic could show features such as the 'trailing (bursting) end', which are only mentioned in the text.

RMcPhillip (talk) 14:48, 19 March 2021 (UTC)