Talk:Photopsin

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Martin Gühmann in topic Why does "porphyropsin" redirect here?

Untitled

edit

It seems that the Rhodopsin article has much of the same information and is more complete.

Wavelength or frequency?

edit

This article, like all literature on the subject, treats the -opsins in terms of wavelength. But is it wavelength they are sensitive to, or frequency? The law of refraction states that EM frequency remains the same, but wavelength does not, across a transition medium. The frequency of a particular light emitted in vacuum, which crosses into air, and then vitreous humor, is constant. The wavelength is not. --76.217.90.99 01:15, 4 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

In birds and other animals

edit

The photopsins that exist in humans are not the only ones that exist. Could anyone name the UV-sensitive photopsin that gives birds their tetrachromacy? Are there any infrared-sensitive photopsins? If so, what animals use them? What genes are responsible for producing various photopsins, and what are the precursor chemicals? 71.202.31.63 (talk) 04:02, 1 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Molecular Structure

edit

Why no mention of the molecular structure?75.129.91.157 (talk) 08:12, 7 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Why does "porphyropsin" redirect here?

edit

Is it a synonym? Equinox 23:11, 21 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

The redirect in non-sense, porphyropsin is rod-opsin with covalently bound 11-cis-retinal-2 while rhodopsin is rod-opsin with covalently bound 11-cis-retinal-1. Two different things, if it all it should redirect to rhodopsin. -- Martin Gühmann (talk) 01:38, 3 December 2021 (UTC)Reply