Talk:Phorm/Archives/2014
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
From Phorm: Page Updates Needed
1.Please update the company fact box to reflect that Steven Heyer is no longer the chairman of the board. Phorm announced on December 1, 2008 that Norman Lamont, Kip Meek, Stefan Allesch-Taylor and Stephen Partridge-Hicks replaced Board members Virasb Vahidi, Steven Heyer, David Dorman and Christopher Lawrence. [1] A new chairman of the board has yet to be named.
2. Please update the “BT Trials” section to reflect the fact that BT’s technical trial with Phorm has now ended. Phorm announced on December 15, 2008 that the trial concluded and following a period of assessment, BT has informed the company that it expects to move toward commercial deployment. [2]
3. Please update the “Overview of Proposed Service” section to reflect the fact that Phorm currently does not have commercial trial agreements in place with U.S. ISPs but sees the U.S. as a priority market. [3]
4. Please update the “Overview of Proposed Service” section to reflect the fact that once a person has opted out of the Phorm system, their activity is NOT mirrored. [4] AND [5] --IworkforPhorm (talk) 19:59, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
- That should be updatd soon, the opt-out bit the reference will have to be verified it says that or proves it, if it does it will be updated as well :)--Andrewcrawford (talk) 13:12, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
Question:
This article is a bit out of date and some of the sources are unreliable and/or have dead links. I marked some of the problem areas and added recent information about Phorm's financial reports and ISP partners to bring the page more up to date. I feel like I should delete some of the unreliable or missing sources I marked, because they have not been updated. What do you think? WaltBusterkeys (talk) 02:19, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Brazil section is a jumble
Couldn't help noticing how crazy the Brazil section is, ending in the words "Ooops, slightly broke things.". Was this a bad edit? Matt (talk) 11:52, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
- South Korea was also a disaster and the other section have some odd stuff. I've trimmed Brazil and South Korea way back. --NeilN talk to me 00:09, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- ^ http://www.reuters.com/article/rbssTechMediaTelecomNews/idUSBNG42555620081201.
- ^ http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/markets/article5349053.ece
- ^ http://gigaom.com/2008/09/04/while-nebuad-retreats-phorm-and-bt-plow-ahead/
- ^ http://www2.bt.com/static/i/btretail/webwise/customer_choice.html
- ^ http://gigaom.com/2008/09/04/while-nebuad-retreats-phorm-and-bt-plow-ahead/