Talk:Peyk-i Şevket-class cruiser/GA1
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Sturmvogel 66 in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 23:07, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
I'll get to this shortly.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 23:07, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
- No DABs, external links OK.
- Image appropriately licensed.
- Standardize on ftin conversions from meters, please.
- I think the only one of these I saw was the draft figure in the box, which is now fixed.
- I actually meant for you to add them for all of the conversions, but I went ahead and added them myself.
- I think the only one of these I saw was the draft figure in the box, which is now fixed.
- as a torpedo cruiser by the Ottoman Navy,[1] was also sometimes referred to as Missing conjunction, I think.
- Good catch.
- The ships were powered by a pair of vertical triple-expansion engines each driving a screw propeller. The ships' four Awkward, howzabout "their" for the beginning of the second sentence?
- Works for me.
- Watch your rounding; 450mm isn't 18 inches.
- These dang conversion templates...
- Link to definition of caliber.
- It's already there.
- Ooops, indeed it was!
- It's already there.
- Title case for Erickson, please.
- Fixed.
- 500th GA review! You should feel honored ;-) Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:19, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
- I certainly do! I've got to catch up - only done 94... Parsecboy (talk) 12:53, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
- You're practically a FNG! (swaggers into the saloon and puts a foot on the bar rail while ordering a double shot of sarsaparilla) (I wonder what it tastes like? Don't think I've ever actually had any.)--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 16:38, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
- I certainly do! I've got to catch up - only done 94... Parsecboy (talk) 12:53, 24 February 2015 (UTC)