Talk:Pero Qué Necesidad/GA2

Latest comment: 15 days ago by Kyle Peake in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Magiciandude (talk · contribs) 17:48, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 08:07, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply


  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a. (reference section):  
    b. (citations to reliable sources):  
    c. (OR):  
    d. (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a. (major aspects):  
    b. (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):  
    b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/fail:  

(Criteria marked   are unassessed)

Of course we've been in reviews together for the past so you know what to expect; this one should be done quickly! --K. Peake 08:07, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead

edit
  • Change Soundabout Studio to Soundabout per Template:Infobox song
  • The translation title can be written out in the body, rather than invoking the ref in the lead
  • "Its production was handled by" → "The song was produced by" and also add written by Juan Gabriel since the lead is short enough that you could do with this inclusion
  • "The song is a" → "It is a" to sound less repetitive
  • "It was released" → "The song was released"
  • "with critics listing" → "with a few critics listing"
  • The term "several" being used is redundant
  • Add a comma before whose in the last sentence

Background and composition

edit
  • Add the release year of "Heal the World" on the audio sample
  • "a hiatus following legal disputes" → "a hiatus after legal disputes"
  • "The dispute involved Gabriel" → "The dispute involved Juan Gabriel" to be consistent
  • "but would not be released" → "but it would not be released"
  • "and Gabriel renewed his" → "and Juan Gabriel renewed his"
  • "both the name of the album" → "both the album's title of" removing the brackets since they would not be needed in this case
  • "in which lyrics describes" → "in which the lyrics describe"
  • "He re-recorded the track" → "Juan Gabriel re-recorded the track"

Promotion and reception

edit
  • Per the Los Angeles Times ref currently used in the lead, add a second sentence with the translated title and mention the Spanish radio from that ref
  • "brotherhood". It features children" → "brotherhood", featuring children" to improve the flow
  • "Ramiro Burr wrote for the" → "Ramiro Burr, writing for the"
  • "compared it to ABBA" → "compared the song to ABBA"
  • "despite its "serious theme", he found it" → "despite the "serious theme", he found the song"
  • "Classic Rock reviewer ranked it" → "a Classic Rock reviewer ranked the song" and the source shows number seven for me, not number three
  • "Gabriel earned the" → "Juan Gabriel earned the"
  • "Commercially, it topped" → "Commercially, the track topped"

Charts

edit
  • Why is this table not present when the song did reach charts?

See also

edit
  • Good

References

edit

Final thoughts and verdict

edit
  •   On hold until everything is covered; this article passes a lot of the criterion but some changes are needed to get it over the line! --K. Peake 08:48, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
    @Kyle Peake Thanks as always for the reviews! I addressed everything mentioned, but I wasn't sure what you meant with the LA Times article for the translation so I did the best as I understood. Erick (talk) 23:50, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
    @Erick Thank you, however "compared it to ABBA" needs to use the song instead and wikilink La Tercera on ref 7; the translation source is exactly to my liking fab job! --K. Peake 09:12, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
    @Kyle Peake   Done Erick (talk) 15:39, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
     Pass now, thanks for the quick fixes here! --K. Peake 17:26, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply