Talk:Pennsylvania Route 576/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Rschen7754 (talk · contribs) 05:34, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

• Reference 12 is dead.
• Usually citations are not put in the lead if the details are cited in the rest of the article.
• The third paragraph seems awfully trivial to put in the lead. Maybe elsewhere, but not in the lead.
• doesn't - please do not use contractions in an article.
• While it could be argued that Pittsburgh does have somewhat of an existing beltway - sounds like WP:OR
• Additionally, I-70 in between Washington and New Stanton, as well as the Turnpike, are not up to modern Interstate Highway standards. - how is that relevant here?
• A bunch of uncited stuff at the end of "Early development"
• And stuff that is missing. We go from the 1980s to 2003 just like that. In the modern era, I find it hard to believe that there are no sources out there that provide information about how the highway was developed during those years.
• The Findlay Connector was called as such - wordy
• More uncited stuff
• it would be a major boom for both the Southern Beltway - too colloquial, and how can a highway benefit from the opening of a plant?
• it will be signed as Interstate 576 - was it ever approved by AASHTO and FHWA?
• In the RJL - Access to McDonald and Pennsylvania Route 980 - what is McDonald? Also, we already said PA 980, why do we need to repeat it in this column?
• Also in the RJL - if it's not a complete sentence, it does not get a period.

Given that this fails the sourcing and broad criterion of GA, and due to the large amount of work needed to fix the article, I will need to fail it at this time. --Rschen7754 20:28, 29 November 2014 (UTC)