| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pelvis article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This  level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.PNG)
 | The contents of the Human pelvis page were merged into Pelvis. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
The male/female dichotomy presented in this article is false edit
The drawings presented are 120 years old, and were based on assumptions, not fact. They are exaggerations to present a binary cissexist fantasy as reality. This article makes bold claims about evolution and a sex binary that has zero basis in reality, zero evidence, and zero scientific validity. This entire article is mostly wrong and should probably we rewritten from scratch. 89.247.174.133 (talk) 01:09, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
What about monotremes? edit
Is In mammals, the bony pelvis has a gap in the middle, significantly larger in females than in males.
(last paragraph of the lede) also true of monotremes? If so, the next sentence should have "or eggs" added after "offspring". Otherwise, maybe qualify "mammals". The Crab Who Played With The Sea (talk) 02:24, 22 February 2024 (UTC)