Talk:Pauropoda

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Animalparty in topic Which names of orders?

Blind? edit

The article says both that pauropods are blind, and that they are "shy of light". It can't really be both, can it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by CarlFink (talkcontribs) 14:44, 3 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Which names of orders? edit

The lead paragraph and taxobox are not consistent with the text with respect to the order-level circumscription of the class. Pauropodina or Hexamerocerata & Tetramerocerata? The latter two are what Ruggiero et al use, which seems like a good default choice. DCDuring (talk) 16:06, 17 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

As Col, Tol, and Wikispecies uses the latter, I am changing the lead. Stikkyy (talk) 18:26, 10 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, Stikkyy. For reference, the most recent and authoritative taxonomic sources are probably found in the following:
    • Scheller, Ulf (2008). "A reclassification of the Pauropoda (Myriapoda)". International Journal of Myriapodology. 1 (1): 1–38. doi:10.1163/187525408X316730.
    • Scheller, Ulf (2011). "Pauropoda". In Minelli, Alessandro (ed.). Treatise on Zoology - Anatomy, Taxonomy, Biology. The Myriapoda. Vol. 1. Brill. ISBN 90-04-15611-9.
    • Minelli, Alessandro (2011). "Class Chilopoda, Class Symphyla and Class Pauropoda. In: Zhang, Z.-Q. (Ed.) Animal biodiversity: An outline of higher-level classification and survey of taxonomic richness" (PDF). Zootaxa. 3148: 157–158. (an outline).
--Animalparty! (talk) 03:45, 11 January 2017 (UTC)Reply