Talk:Paulhan-Tatin Aéro-Torpille No.1

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Paulhan-Tatin Aéro-Torpille No.1 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Proper name is Aéro-Torpille edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

A translation of Aéro-Torpille may be Aero Torpedo, but that is NOT what it is COMMONLY known as and particularly by it's designers / builders. The perpetrator of the travesty appears to be Flight which persisted in calling it Aero Torpedo despite almost every other contemporary source using it's real title, then and now. Does anyone want to discuss this?--Petebutt (talk) 18:37, 30 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Good point, rename it.TheLongTone (talk) 22:10, 30 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic