Talk:Paul Richey/GA1

Latest comment: 6 months ago by Pickersgill-Cunliffe in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk · contribs) 15:14, 13 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

I'll take a look at this shortly. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 15:14, 13 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Prelim edit

  • Article is stable
  • Images correctly licensed
  • Earwig reports copyvio unlikely

Lede and infobox edit

  • Did Richey actually command 609 Sqn?
  • Yes he did although I realised I missed mentioning this in the lead. Have fixed this oversight and made a few other tweaks. Zawed (talk) 09:02, 22 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Early life edit

  • Do we know the name of his father or mother?

Second World War etc edit

  • The Second World War is not explicitly mentioned until the last line of the entire article!
  • Rephrased the first sentence! Zawed (talk) 03:52, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • "Shot down the same day after the engagement with the Bf 110s" does this mean he was shot down by the 110s, or something else? (ibid next sentence)
  • Have rephrased both these sentences. Zawed (talk) 03:52, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Not sure Bar needs capitalising?
  • I've started doing this since noticing that the postnominal template capitalises it. Zawed (talk) 03:52, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • "was published"
  • "with a posting to No. 56 Squadron" stipulate that he was in command of it
  • Doublechecking my source, I found made a mistake here and conflated his commands of Nos. 56 and 609 Squadron. I have revised the discussion of No 56 Squadron accordingly. Zawed (talk) 03:52, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • "December 1942" repeated year
  • Any operational history for No. 189 Wing?
  • No, unfortunately I don't have access to any sources dealing with the RAF campaign in Burma. Zawed (talk) 03:52, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • "He was subsequently worked" needs a rejig
  • I've removed this from the infobox since I can't determine the nature of No. 189 Wing's role in the campaign. Zawed (talk) 03:52, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

References edit

  • Refs 26, 27, and 28 have broken links
  • I forgot to add the supp=y syntax to the LG template. Zawed (talk) 03:22, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Not required by any means, but it would be interesting to quote an anecdote or two from Richey's books to provide colour
  • I don't have any of his books at the moment, but if I go to A-Class with this one, I will look to do this. Zawed (talk) 03:54, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • AGF on print sources
  • Richey is listed in the template at the bottom of the article as having 10 kills rather than 11?

@Zawed: Hi, that's all I have for now. Will await your replies. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 13:08, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Pickersgill-Cunliffe:, thanks for the review, I have responded as above. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 03:54, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Pickersgill-Cunliffe: just following up on this? Cheers, Zawed (talk) 09:12, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
@Zawed: Oops! I've been very ill recently, still am, and my fever-addled brain truly believed that it had already passed this. Passing as satisfying the GA criteria. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 09:18, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply