Paul Bouche was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete

I think this is a vanity page with little salvageable information, his imdb entry is rather pitiful, and Google doesn't seem to have much of relevance either. Dunc| 20:02, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)

  • Keep, conditionally. Unless someone can show that its a blatant unsalvagable vanity page, it should probably be kept. His IMDB entry is pretty short, but he did apparently (according to the entry) win an Emmy. I'd say he's probably non-notable though.EagleFalconn 20:43, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • Given the below points, I'm going to have to go with Delete.
  • Delete and somebody can write a new, shorter, neutral article that wasn't written by his agent. Tempshill 21:34, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. I can't find any verification of him winning an emmy award. Niteowlneils 21:57, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete: No autobiography, and not a particularly significant/notable performer. Geogre 22:26, 10 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • The Order of Distinction of Chivas Regal? I guess he wasn't quite good enough for the Grape Pucker Medal of Valour. Anyway, vanity article. Yeah he's on the IMDb, but my friend's entry is just as impressive, and I don't think we'll be seeing him here any time soon. Delete. -R. fiend 02:56, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • del. Mikkalai 09:01, 11 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep I agree with Duncharris. This guy, while I may not have heard about him, may be searched for by people. I think that it could be re-written, without POV. JerDW
    • That's why the current article should be deleted "without prejudice". The current article is worthless. It should therefore be deleted. But if someday somebody wants to write a real Wikipedia article about the guy, that'll be fine. Tempshill 21:39, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.

Later comments

This article is informative well balanced and provides information on a subject that is seldom written about spanish language television and media. I assume it is different from whatever article was discussed in the past on this subject.

No, I deleted it, again. You are not notable Paul. You can try to argue your case at Wikipedia:Votes for undeletion Dunc| 16:08, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)