Talk:Patrik Berger/GA1

Latest comment: 10 years ago by ChrisGualtieri in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: ChrisGualtieri (talk · contribs) 05:45, 2 January 2014 (UTC) I'll do this. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 05:45, 2 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Good Article Checklist

  • Well-written -the prose is clear and concise, respects copyright laws, and the spelling and grammar are correct; and it complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
  • Verifiable with no original research: it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline; it provides in-line citations from reliable sources for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines; and it contains no original research.
  • Broad in its coverage: it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
  • Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias, giving due weight to each.
  • Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
  • Illustrated, if possible, by images: images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content; and images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed
  • Disambig links:OK
  • Reference check: OK

Comments: Only very few issues I could find in this article, I think with those fixes there should be no objections to passing. "His only season as a Dortmund player was both frustrating and successful." - Cite, sounds like an opinion.  Done

  • "With wife Jaroslava and their two children, " - Prose.  Done

"Berger scored a brace of goals in a 3–0 win against Leicester City. " - Brace is jargon and cite please.  Done

  • "He left the club,[23] having played 194 games for Liverpool, scoring 35 goals in the process." Cite for the end please.  Done
  • "Patrik's" sic   Not doneMOS:QUOTE recommends sic for a significant error but Patrik is the given spelling and WP:CONTRACTIONS recommends that "contractions should not be expanded mechanically". There are three contractions in the quote and the guideline doesn't appear to require these be deleted.
  • Wasn't the spelling of the name (it is his name afterall) it was error in speech which is possessive. It is a small matter, but would you mind dropping a template on it? ChrisGualtieri (talk) 05:46, 8 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
  • As far as I'm aware, possessive and omissive apostrophes are rendered using the same character, so it is not necessary, however I have added the sic template per your request.  Done
  • Expand on "After the club successfully avoided relegation" and cite "then-manager Alain Perrin and the club chose not to renew his contract in June 2005. "   Done
  • "During his loan spell," Word choice. Also with following sentence.  Done
  • " On 6 May 2008, he was told he had played his last game for Aston Villa after urging captain Gareth Barry to move to Liverpool.[41]" Context of this dispute please. And wording.  Done
  • " In November 2008 Berger scored " missing comma  Done
  • "He was known for his competence from set pieces, being particularly productive in free kick situations."  Done – removed and replaced

That's all the issues I could really find. Please fix them and I can pass it. Placing on hold now. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 15:06, 7 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

OK I'll pass this now. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:29, 11 January 2014 (UTC)Reply