Talk:Patrick Henry Cronin/GA1

Latest comment: 6 years ago by MidwestCuttlefish in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Eddie891 (talk · contribs) 00:25, 14 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Starting this GAR. Hope to be done within a week. Eddie891 Talk Work 00:25, 14 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  • Per WP:LEDE, I'd expect a GA lede to be A) longer, and B)slightly better written. i.e. there should be a lifespan after the name. It should be at least two paragraphs, and go slightly more in depth.
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  2. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  4. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  5. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions): y 
  6. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
MidwestCuttlefish I'm Willing to approve the article pending fixing of the lede issue. Great job Eddie891 Talk Work 00:51, 19 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Eddie891 I expanded the lede. Let me know if that's sufficient. Thank you! MidwestCuttlefish (talk) 22:49, 19 January 2018 (UTC)Reply