Talk:Password length parameter

Cryptography: Computer science High‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cryptography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptographyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptographyTemplate:WikiProject CryptographyCryptography articles
High	This redirect has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as High-importance).

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The contents of this article appear to come from a 1949 US govt. standard and are not very informative and in fact incorrect in the light of modern cryptographic methodology and computer security best practices. I feel this article should either be deleted or it should be pointed out that the content is merely of historical importance. Arvindn 00:00, 23 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

I agree the articles should be merged. But, I don't agree they are "...not very informative and in fact incorrect in the light of modern cryptographic methodology and computer security best practices..."

The equation (basically) calculates the probability of a password being guessed by a brute-force attack (likely meant for comparison with an acceptable probability). Brute-force will ALWAYS be one method of attacking a password, regardless of advances in cryptography, so this equation gives a ball-park guess at a probability with a minimum of calculation...so I think the equation should stay.

Warren Stevens M.A.Sc. P.Eng.

Add topic