Talk:Passive intellect

Latest comment: 5 years ago by 162.129.251.86 in topic "Knowledge in act"

"Knowledge in act"

edit

I take it this was a proofreading error and that the phrase is supposed to be "knowledge in actuality". Fixed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.129.251.86 (talk) 16:50, 7 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Only Philosophy

edit

I removed reference to psychology in this article as it seems to be no longer in wide use. If it is important enough, I would suggest a separate article for it. JEN9841 (talk) 05:24, 17 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

I agree. In psychology, the term is "passive knowledge". --Sir Myles na Gopaleen (the da) (talk) 09:38, 18 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

passive intellect in Islamic philosophy

edit

I lately created an page about passive intellect in Islamic philosophy. as you proposed on the talk page of Draft:Mehdi ghaed/Aql Bil Quwwah, I would like to add a sub-heading "Passive intellect in Islamic philosophy".--m,sharaf (talk) 19:18, 6 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Passive intellect. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:54, 25 January 2018 (UTC)Reply