This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Lack of Research or an advert?
editWho created this page? There's a lot of stuff on here that is wrong! Someone didn't do their research!
This reads like an advert. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.47.49.25 (talk) 00:01, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
Rather than a lack of research, it does give the impression the the article was written to advertise the attraction. I've been through the Pasaje Del Terror and really enjoyed it. This write up smacks of corporate blurb and would actually put me off. And each time I've been through (3 times in all) I didn't have to solve any puzzles. I can't remember at any point the lights going out to come back on to a very different scene. The closest thing like this was the Pinhead section, yet it doesn't really match the description in the article. I can't say these things don't happen, so I won't edit them out. Calindreams (talk) 14:47, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
I've made some attempt to make the description of the Pasaje experience read less like an advert. I'm sure there is more that could be done. Calindreams (talk) 14:31, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
Terror on Chruch Street
editTerror on Church Street was never a ride, let alone a dark ride --TimothyJacobson (talk) 16:00, 16 June 2009
London
editI saw a Pasaje del Teror in Picadilly Circus today. Anyone have any information? --TimothyJacobson (talk) 16:03, 16 June 2009
I've added a sentence about the London Version. I can't give a good description about it since I haven't visited the attraction and it is now closed down. -- 90.192.98.186 (talk) 17:46, 11 August 2011 (UTC)