Talk:Partition (song)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 18:13, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Appears to be a solid article. I'll have this to you within 48 hours ☯ Jaguar ☯ 18:13, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Has an appropriate reference section:

   B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Initial comments

• ""Partition" is a song recorded by American singer Beyoncé for her self-titled fifth studio album (2013)" - I'd write this as "Partition" is a song recorded by American singer Beyoncé for her self-titled fifth studio album released in 2013 - just a suggestion though
• The lead summarizes the article well, so this passes
• "The production was handled by Timberlake, Beyoncé, Dean, Boots" - why is 'Boots' under his pseudonym here whereas everybody else mentioned isn't?
• "I got to the mic, I'm like, 'Oh, press Record'"? - should record be capitalized?
• "Midway the following year, the writers of Spin magazine placed it at number four on the list of the 57 best songs so far" - this part is unreferenced, and also "midway the following year" sounds like guesswork, could it be pinned down to June/July 2014?
• The first paragraph in the Synopsis section is unreferenced

References

• Ref 55 is dead
• This link is dead too, but I'm not sure where it is used in the article

On hold

Like the last one I reviewed, this is overall a well written and solid article. The concerns above are relatively minor, so I'll put this on hold for the standard seven days until everything is addressed. Thanks ☯ Jaguar ☯ 17:01, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Close - not listed

I'm sorry to do this, but I'll have to close this due to inactivity. It is such a nice article though, so if all of the above can be addressed please come to me again and I will probably 'quick-pass' it like I did to the inactive Rocket GAN. Thanks ☯ Jaguar ☯ 16:31, 7 February 2015 (UTC)