Talk:Parliament of 1327/GA1

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Serial Number 54129 in topic Comments

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Auntieruth55 (talk · contribs) 15:09, 13 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

I'll start this in a couple of days. auntieruth (talk) 15:09, 13 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
Made a couple of tweaks to the lead toclarify who "he" was. Removed duplicated information. Also, I suggest using Infobox Historical Event to summarize the data. It will help to make theplayers and opponents clearer. auntieruth (talk) 14:42, 15 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    needs infobox.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):   d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Comments edit

  • Serial Number 54129...really? Info boxes are political? I don't think so. I'll pass it, but....14:17, 18 June 2018 (UTC)Reply