This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cephalopods, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CephalopodsWikipedia:WikiProject CephalopodsTemplate:WikiProject CephalopodsCephalopods articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
The stuff about squid, octopods, and cuttlefish seems hardly relevant to this subject, which is about a specific fossil subfamily of gonititic ammonites. What is relevant, and missing, is descriptive, stratigraphic, and locality information regarding this subfamily. For any reader willing to be distracted, the fact that ammonoids are more closely related to the aforementioned groups of cephalopds can be expressed more concisely. Also, this page, the WikiProject Geology template seems only remotely relevant, if at all. Besides it should be re-designed to take up about a third the space.
J.H.McDonnell (talk) 14:06, 21 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
As noted elsewhere issues about templates should be taken to the relevant template talk page, as posting the issue here will not generate any dialog about it.--Kevmin§ 15:39, 21 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
Also please use the correct formatting for section headers. Do not add the extra "-"'s to your headers.--Kevmin§ 15:43, 21 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
