Talk:Parasite (2019 film)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 3E1I5S8B9RF7 (talk · contribs) 18:26, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

A very good article, but several issues need to be addressed and corrected in order for it to get promoted. The sections with issues are listed bellow.--3E1I5S8B9RF7 (talk) 18:26, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

References

References from no. 137 to 144 all have unformatted, "raw" url links. Sources no. 95, 96 as well. This needs to be properly formatted, like the rest of the references.

• References have been reformatted. Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 13:14, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Filming

"The director of photography for the film is Hong Kyung-pyo." No source at the end of this paragraph.

• Fixed Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 13:28, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Music

"...the romanisation of names and nouns used are slightly different from those seen in the official English subtitles as translated by Darcy Paquet." The same issue, no source at the end of this paragraph.

• Fixed Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 13:28, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Accolades

"being the third film to win both grand prizes after the former and The Lost Weekend." Again, no source at the end of this paragraph.

• Fixed Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 13:28, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Critical response

This section just quotes the reviews verbatim. Quote after quote after quote. Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. This needs to be summarized and editorized, with the examples being The Thing, Ghostbusters II and others.

• @3E1I5S8B9RF7: I have compacted the information presented in the section and have paraphrased a few quotes, which I think is sufficient enough to count as completed. Some Dude From North Carolina^{wanna talk?} 00:19, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Conclusion

Promoting the article, since the issues have been addressed.--3E1I5S8B9RF7 (talk) 08:57, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed