This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cephalopods, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CephalopodsWikipedia:WikiProject CephalopodsTemplate:WikiProject CephalopodsCephalopods articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
The taxobox is in direct conflict with the prose of the article by stating Austiniceras to be a genus. Which is the current consensus for this from the authorities?--Kevmin§ 23:21, 21 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Nonsense, and I'm sure the answer, if one is needed, can be found with little difficulty.J.H.McDonnell (talk) 12:41, 30 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Either its a subgenus or a genus. If it is both then the article should clearly state that it covers taxa of two different ranks. --Kevmin§ 21:25, 10 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
