Talk:Pandiatonicism

	Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Music theory, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of music theory, theory terminology, music theorists, and musical analysis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Music theoryWikipedia:WikiProject Music theoryTemplate:WikiProject Music theoryMusic theory articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Comment edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I agree that much of Petrushka is an example of pandiatonicism, but the introduction implies that Stravinsky wrote pandiatonically in his neoclassic period exclusively. I would change it, but I am not sure whether "neoclassic period" should be changed to "Russian period" or removed completely- I do not know enough about Stravinsky to make that call 72.88.227.172 01:41, 14 August 2007 (UTC)anonReply

"This Boy" edit

This Boy doesn't sound pandiatonic to me, the progression is a VI II V I and the tonic is well defined. The melody seems off, but the harmony isn't really. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mirak1979 (talk • contribs) 06:25, 21 February 2012‎

Source Issue edit

The references on this page are done manually, and it looks sort of weird and isn't very user friendly. I would fix it but I'm not sure how. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.135.210.48 (talk) 13:28, 21 September 2011

Add topic