Talk:Panayiotou v Sony Music Entertainment (UK) Ltd.

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Moonriddengirl in topic Copyright problem removed

Merging edit

I dont think that this article should be merged because it has its own relevancy. GM25LIVE (talk) 21:20, 8 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Needs both sides . . . edit

Needs both sides and quotations from the judgment. Title should be put in legal style. GeorgeLouis (talk) 04:09, 19 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

substantial plagiarism from nonfree source edit

I was tagging this for cleanup and something about the phrasings struck me as journalistic rather than encyclopediac. A little bit of Google work and I found http://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/19/business/worldbusiness/19iht-sony.html -- large portions of the article were either directly copied from there, or were only roughly paraphrased. --rahaeli (talk) 20:34, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

  fixed: [1]. FiveColourMap (talk) 01:36, 29 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problem removed edit

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.nytimes.com/1993/10/19/business/worldbusiness/19iht-sony.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:08, 5 February 2012 (UTC)Reply