Talk:PWS-101

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the aircraft project.
	This article is supported by the gliding project.

Weights

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

There is clearly a problem here as Simons' values are much heavier. He's usually a reliable source but the two Polish sources essentially agree with each other and I might have dropped Simons. However, his values for the PWS 101 and the very similar PWS 102 are close, whereas the Polish sources give values far apart. I'd hoped that water ballast might get rid of the difference but 40 kg is not enough. My reading of Simons' weights is that the "Structure" figure includes the ballast otherwise his pilot weighs less than 44 kg! Even allowing for ballast, the Polish/Simons weight are still a significantly apart. Any thoughts? TSRL (talk) 21:36, 16 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

The two polish sources (Glass and Cynk) are translated copies of each other so are bound to agree.--Petebutt (talk) 12:53, 20 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

1938 Paris Salon

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

You might guess that the PWS-101 on display was the record-setting aircraft but I couldn't nail it. Any reliable refs?TSRL (talk) 23:02, 16 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic