Talk:pUC19
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editthis article is about the vector pUC19 and has been written coherently. i have aslo included the DNA sequence of the plasmid for this article. i have also included two references that can be verified. it will be beneficial for the readers if it is not deleted. i am ready to answer any further questions raised regarding the article. Proquence (talk) 18:10, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
The speedy deletion might be due to the large DNA sequence data i have added. please delete the notice if no one has any objection. Proquence (talk) 18:21, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- The article in no way ever qualified for speedy deletion, and, as reviewing administrator, I removed the tag. I see nothing wrong with having the sequence. What the article needs is, first, full citations in the usual academic style to its preparation and analysis, preferably from formally published sources, not just web sites, and, a few selected references from other publications to its use and importance. Include the authors, the title of the paper, the name of journal and the publication information. Also includes a suitable web site where the paper or at least an abstract cna be found, and the PubMed ID. -- all according to WP:CITE. DGG (talk) 19:02, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
Can the name of the article be modified to pUC19, instead of PUC19? Proquence (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
Done waggers (talk) 13:56, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
Incorrect citation
editMooreland; et al. (2013). Advanced Biomolecular Genetics. Kleiske Publishing. pp. 889–932. Cannot verify the existence of this citation. Kleiske Publishing does not seem to exist. Citation should be removed or replaced. --72.204.6.233 (talk) 03:55, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
pUC19 versus other pUC vectors
editThe article briefly mentions pUC18 and compares pUC19 with it. Now, I came to wikipedia to find out how many pUC variants exist, historically. I only know of pUC18 and pUC19, but not why they were named that way, and how many other pUC variants may exist. Would it be possible to add a new article at wikipedia, that can refer to ALL these pUC variants? It is ok if there is only pUC18 and pUC19, but it would be nice if that can be mentioned in a separate article clearly. (Mentioning it here in the pUC19 article may not be 100% appropriate, if there are many pUC-variants. Right now I simply don't know how many variants exist, e. g. if there are more than 2 variants or not.) 2A02:8388:1643:D680:C23D:D743:2A9C:ACFE (talk) 21:09, 27 July 2024 (UTC)