Talk:Proto-Indo-European root word
(Redirected from Talk:PIE root words)
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Jerzy in topic Reason for WP:PROD
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Proto-Indo-European root word article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This page was proposed for deletion by Haruth (talk · contribs) on 28 March 2010 with the comment: Not disambiguation page & no reason to develop as article as all aspects are already covered in main PIE article pages (See Talk for list existing articles). It was contested by Jerzy (talk · contribs) on 2010-03-31 with the comment: Dab-CU done per WP:MoSDab (see talk:PIE root words#Reason for WP:PROD), but allow time for Dab-CU review. |
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Not a valid disambiguation page. No reason to have as a stand alone article, as all information is already covered in main Proto-Indo-European language pages at:
- Proto-Indo-European language#Morphology
- Proto-Indo-European root
- Proto-Indo-European verb#Primary forms
- Proto-Indo-European verb#Root aspect
- Proto-Indo-European verb#Secondary forms
- Proto-Indo-European noun#Root nouns
- Proto-Indo-European noun#Primary and secondary derivation
- Proto-Indo-European noun#Prefixes and reduplication
--Haruth (talk) 21:20, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
- The ProD reason was
- Not disambiguation page & no reason to develop as article as all aspects are already covered in main PIE article pages (See Talk for list existing articles)
- Deletion is not acceptable, as the page has existed for 4.5 years and users are likely to lk to it from WP clones, other ext pages, or their own bookmarks: it's too late to ProD it.
I'm converting it to a valid Dab page, on its own terms (which might be called for even if the targets were all on the same page -- after all, merging of pages calls for targeting different existing Rdrs to sections of same page). If other sections are deemed likely to be sought via the long-standing title, the Dab can be expanded with corresponding entries.
--Jerzy•t 08:53, 31 March 2010 (UTC)