Talk:Oxaziridine/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   This reads like it was written by a professional. Very well done.

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

   All your resources appear to be major chemical journals, which easily pass the requirements for notability and verifiability.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   Broad coverage? Definitely!

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Placement of images is used perfectly to illustrate the reactions discussed.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Easily Passed. Though it addresses a complex topic, this article covers all of the most important reactions and unique properties of this class of chemicals.
   For further improvement, I would suggest the addition of a computer-generated 3-D structure of a sample Oxaziridine, to illustrate the unique C-N-O triangle spatially.

Reviewer: Spinach Dip 06:14, 29 December 2010 (UTC)