Talk:Overloaded: The Singles Collection/GA1

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Calvin999 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Calvin999 (talk · contribs) 13:17, 27 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

I will review this article tomorrow. (Monday 30th) Aaron You Da One 11:24, 29 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thank you, Calvin. Till 23:58, 29 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  


Info box

edit
  • You still list the normal chronology of the last and next album, regardless of what type of album it is.

Lead

edit
  • No issues.

Background

edit
  • No issues.

Release and content

edit
  • No issues.

Critical reception

edit
  • No issues.

Commercial performance

edit
  • No issues.

Singles

edit
  • No issues.

Promotion

edit
  • No issues.

Tracklisting

edit
  • No issues.

Charts and certifications

edit
  • I c/e this section slightly.
  • Can you add a release history table?
    • Okay. Should I also list the credits? Till 11:25, 30 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

References

edit

Summary

edit

On hold for 7 days. Aaron You Da One 11:03, 30 July 2012 (UTC)Reply