This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Latest comment: 1 year ago5 comments2 people in discussion
I just added a couple of factoids and cited my own peer-reviewed paper in support. TAH is a reliable source, but other editors here may wish to review my edit in the interests of WP:COI and so on. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 12:07, 18 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
LOL, no, that meets the terms set out in WP:SPS. You're a published subject matter expert! - Ahunt (talk) 18:05, 18 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
! ... But seriously, SPS is more about dubious third-party sources. Per the advice at WP:EXPERT; "Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy does allow an editor to include information from their own publications in Wikipedia articles and to cite them. ... When in doubt, it is good practice for a person who may have a conflict of interest to disclose it on the relevant article's talk page and to suggest changes there rather than in the article." — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 19:13, 18 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
Ah, as long as you don't do it too often to the point of WP:PROMOTION no one will likely mind. I have many software reviews regularly published in a WP:RS and occasionally cite myself when there are no better refs. At least I know the info is correct! My vote is that your addition is Approved. - Ahunt (talk) 22:59, 18 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
! ... But seriously, SPS is more about dubious third-party sources. Per the advice at WP:EXPERT; "Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy does allow an editor to include information from their own publications in Wikipedia articles and to cite them. ... When in doubt, it is good practice for a person who may have a conflict of interest to disclose it on the relevant article's talk page and to suggest changes there rather than in the article." — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 19:13, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Approved. - Ahunt (talk) 22:59, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
