Talk:Oskar Schindler/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lemurbaby (talk · contribs) 04:41, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

Comments

• I've read this through, verified the references, and checked the image copyright status. I find the article is comprehensive, very well written and thoroughly referenced, and meets all GA standards. Excellent work! - Lemurbaby (talk) 04:41, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Good gravy. This is my first one to pass without needing any tweeks. Thanks for taking the time to do the review. Best, -- Diannaa (talk) 16:22, 21 July 2013 (UTC)