This isn't really suitable for the Wikipedia - it's too chatty and informal, and there's too much of the first person. In short, it doesn't have an encyclopaedic tone. Anybody have any ideas what might be done with it? --Camembert
This isn't really suitable for the Wikipedia - it's too chatty and informal, and there's too much of the first person. In short, it doesn't have an encyclopaedic tone. Anybody have any ideas what might be done with it? --Camembert